Mental DailyMental Daily
  • Clinical
  • Health
  • I/O
  • Cybernetic
  • Social
  • More
    • Opinion
    • My Bookmarks
Aa
Mental Daily
Aa
  • Clinical
  • Health
  • I/O
  • Cybernetic
  • Social
  • Opinion
Search
  • Clinical
  • Health
  • I/O
  • Cybernetic
  • Social
  • More
    • Opinion
    • My Bookmarks
Follow US
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Inc. Profile
  • Google Play Store
© 2022 - Mental Daily. All Rights Reserved.
Social

How inattention to accuracy increases the likelihood of COVID-19 misinformation

Staff Writer
Staff Writer 3 years ago
Updated 2021/10/27 at 1:08 PM
Share
SHARE

In early-2020, the World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus declared an ‘infodemic’ given the wealth of misinformation and disinformation on social networking sites pertaining to the recent coronavirus pandemic.

Cycles of disinformation perpetrated by countries such as China, Iran, and the United States, have led to a perilous spreading of health-related content on social media, distorting users’ choices of what should be shared on news feeds.

To understand how to combat the ongoing flow of false information on social media, a group of researchers did a comprehensive examination of what drives users incapable of properly distinguishing non-accurate from accurate stories. The findings were published in Psychological Science.

“People often assume that misinformation and fake news is shared online because people are incapable of distinguishing between what is true and what is false,” according to the study’s lead author.

“Our research reveals that is not necessarily the case. Instead, we find that people tend to share false information about COVID-19 on social media because they simply fail to think about accuracy when making decisions about what to share with others.”

The research group, comprised of experts from the University of Regina and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, recruited over 1,500 US-based adult participants as part of two studies.

In their studies, the participants were presented with headlines from a list of 15 inaccurate and 15 accurate headlines associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Established sites considered to be of the highest factual accuracy, such as Live Science and Mayo Clinic, played a major role in determining which headlines to utilize and post on Facebook.

From the posts shown on the social networking platform, the participants were asked if what they saw was accurate or if they would share it on their own news feed.

In the first study, researchers concluded that users tend to prevalently refrain from considering accuracy when deciding what to post on their news feeds, increasing the risk of sharing false information.

For the second study, it was determined that an accuracy reminder implemented at the beginning of the experiments heightened the decision-making process, decreasing the instances of false information posted on news feeds.

“Our results, which mirror those found previously for political fake news, suggest that nudging people to think about accuracy is a simple way to improve choices about what to share on social media,” the co-authors implied in their findings.

“This research has important theoretical and practical implications. Theoretically, our findings shed new light on the perspective that inattention plays an important role in the sharing of misinformation online. By demonstrating the role of inattention in the context of COVID-19 misinformation (rather than politics), our results suggest that partisanship is not, apparently, the key factor distracting people from considering accuracy on social media.”

Photo: Getty Images

You Might Also Like

UK research indicates one in three children in the care system enter the juvenile justice system

Study finds women have been found to be just as corrupt as men in Mexico

Study finds domestic violence convictions in Australia are more likely with prerecorded evidence

Terrorist attacks result in the lasting acceptance of affected communities

Investigation of court transcripts indicates that jury selection is influenced by bias

TAGGED: COVID-19, misinformation, social media
Staff Writer July 2, 2020
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Whatsapp Email Print
Previous Article Menopause may raise the risk of developing metabolic syndrome
Next Article Depth of media coverage for academic papers strongly based on number of citations

Recommended

Social

UK research indicates one in three children in the care system enter the juvenile justice system

3 Min Read
Social

Study finds women have been found to be just as corrupt as men in Mexico

2 Min Read
Social

Study finds domestic violence convictions in Australia are more likely with prerecorded evidence

2 Min Read
Social

Terrorist attacks result in the lasting acceptance of affected communities

2 Min Read
//

We are a trusted online source for research news and resources on all aspects of the mind and human behavior.

Verticals

  • Clinical
  • Health
  • Social
  • I/O
  • Opinion

Social

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Inc. Profile
  • Google Play Store

Links

  • About
  • Contact
  • The Editor
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Follow US

© 2022 Mental Daily. All Rights Reserved.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Inc. Profile
  • Google Play Store

Removed from reading list

Undo
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?